Limbo - * * *

John Sayles directs this Alaskan drama. A fisherman (David Strathairn) is traumatized by an accident at sea. Years later, in his Alaskan hometown, he falls for a lounge singer (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio)…but encounters trouble when his brother (Casey Siemaszko) returns to town. Vanessa Martinez, Kris Kristofferson, Leo Burmester, Kathryn Grody, Michael Laskin and Rita Taggart also star. 

Capsule Review: Well written and acted all around (particularly from Vanessa Williams as Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio’s troubled daughter). The story is well built, as all of the characters (including the audience) are stuck in one sort of limbo or another. The film will ultimately frustrate those expecting more standard fare, but the art house crowd, and those anxious to discuss the finer points of filmmaking, will be pleased.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Limbo

Buena Vista Social Club - * * 1/2*

Wim Wenders directs this documentary about the Cuban jazz scene.

Capsule Review: A light documentary, where all of the aging musicians have interesting stories to tell. It’s the music, though, that you’ll remember.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged | Comments Off on Buena Vista Social Club

Instinct - 1/2*

Instinct

You always have to be careful when approaching a movie involving gorillas. Things can quickly turn ugly, and you can be left with something resembling Congo or (shudder) Buddy. However, every now and then, you’ll run across a Gorillas in the Mist, or even a King Kong. That time is not now. Instinct thoroughly wastes a talented cast, and quickly dissolves into a mishmash of wayward plots and overpuffed intentions.

Anthony Hopkins plays Professor Ethan Powell, a noted anthropologist who gets bitten by a radioactive gorilla, and transforms into the super-powered ApeMan, set to wreak justice upon the evil “Takers”. Well, not really…but that would probably be a more logical and much more entertaining film than Instinct.

What Prof. Powell does become is an inhuman killer, after spending two years in the wild with a tribe of gorillas (presumably none of them are radioactive, though we can always dream). Cuba Gooding Jr. plays Theo Caulder, a psychiatrist out to make a name for himself by probing Powell’s primitive psyche.

Or at least that’s what the film is presumably about. There are so many digressions into the exploits of the colorful, yet murderous, inmates of the prison, the cruelty of the prison guards, the strained relationship between Powell and his daughter, Lyn (Maura Tierney), and even an entire “nature-good, man-bad” subplot, that is is easy to lose track. Not that you’d be missing much.

Watching the film, you feel like there must have been a war between screenwriters, each with a completely different agenda. However, the film boasts only one writer, Gerald DiPego. However, when you take into consideration that in the film’s inspiration, Daniel Quinn’s novel, Ishmael, Anthony Hopkins’ character was actually a talking gorilla, something just doesn’t seem right. Somewhere between book and script there was a nuclear meltdown, and the screenplay never recovered.

Anthony Hopkins, who is about as infallible as actors get these days, delivers a careless performance. Most of the time, he merely apes his infamous Hannibal Lecter role. For the rest of the film, he reverts to a glowering catatonic state. He’s hardly a riveting figure for the film’s two hours.

Cuba Gooding Jr. doesn’t uphold his end of the film, either. His character is so endlessly boyishly exuberant that it’s irritating. And those two are the best drawn characters in the film. Everyone else is either entirely motiveless, or placed in the movie simply for color.

Director Jon Turteltaub directs this movie as if Ethan Powell had the most important message mankind has yet to hear. It is such a portentous buildup that it actually becomes quite a letdown when we learn that it is merely the umpteenth remix of the ol’ “Let’s Get Back to Nature” ideal.

Smug, solemn and somnolent, Instinct is never as good as it tries to be. Most of the time, it’s far far worse. Civilization does have its faults. This movie is one of them.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Instinct

The Thirteenth Floor - *

The Thirteenth Floor is the latest Hollywood film to jump on the virtual reality bandwagon. However, unlike previous films in the new genre, this one lands with a heavy thud.

The movie starts intriguingly enough. An elderly man in 1937 Los Angeles passes a mysterious message to a bartender, proceeds home to bed, and awakens in the modern day. We soon discover that the 1937 world is a virtual reality simulation created by the man, Hannon Fuller (Armin Mueller-Stahl), who is subsequently murdered.

Enter Fuller’s protégé, Douglas Hall (Craig Bierko), suffering from a very convenient case of amnesia. He wakes up with bloody clothes and no memory of the last night. This, of course, makes him Detective Larry McBain’s (Dennis Haysbert) prime suspect for the murder.

But there are more layers to this onion. Fuller’s mysterious daughter, Jane (Gretchen Mol) appears out of nowhere to claim Fuller’s company. Meanwhile, Fuller’s chief programmer Whitney (Vincent D’Onofrio) has been running dangerous experiments with the virtual world. Somehow, it is supposed to be surprising that all these threads are related in some way.

The Thirteenth Floor has the distinct misfortune to follow on the heels of several superior “virtual-reality” themed films, (The Matrix and eXistenZ). All of these films evoke the question, “what is reality?” However, in The Thirteenth Floor, you couldn’t care less.

There are a few good ideas at the core of The Thirteenth Floor, but the film thoroughly fails to exploit any of them. Its script is a patchwork of lousy dialogue, inane plot twists and inconceivable leaps of logic.

Craig Bierko delivers his lines like an eerie clone of Jeff Goldblum. His dispassionate display lacks the slightest trace of charisma, and is strangely bereft of even the hints of humanity. He should take a page from the book of Rufus Sewell, who awakened in a similar dilemma in last year’s Dark City, and, though bereft of memory, still made an intriguing character.

In fact, the only actor (or actress, for that matter) that provides a single spark of excitement to this dreary film is Vincent D’Onofrio. Alternately playing a nebbish and a madman, his character’s actions never make a whole lot of sense, but at least he seems to relish doing them.

There’s not much noteworthy at all up on The Thirteenth Floor. Even the special effects are disappointing (the film’s VR transitions seem lifted from Stargate, and the big “money shot” is overwhelmingly lackluster). Since you can get your VR fix from several better films, there’s no need to logon here.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Thirteenth Floor

Star Wars: Episode 1 – The Phantom Menace - * * *

Star Wars: Episode 1 - The Phantom Menace

If you’ve lived in a cave for the past twenty-five years, you may be the only one unfamiliar with the Star Wars saga. It’s been a mere sixteen years since George Lucas delivered the last chapter in this science fiction space opera. For the fourth film, he goes back in time, creating a prequel to the original trilogy. Lucas has gotten rusty, and it shows in quite a few places. But he still has the heart of a visionary, and when that shines through, The Phantom Menace is a wonder to behold.

The action starts with two Jedi knights, an apprentice, Obi-Wan (Ewan McGregor), and a master, Qui-Gon (Liam Neeson), who are sent to negotiate a settlement between the evil Trade Federation and the peaceful planet of Naboo. Little do they know that the Trade Federation is being manipulated by a mysterious Sith Lord named Darth Sideous, and his pupil, the sinister Darth Maul (Ray Park).

The humans of Naboo are ruled by an elected monarch, the young Queen Amidala (Natalie Portman). Amidala refuses to buckle to the Trade Federation’s demands, and is hoping for action from the Republic’s senate to end the blockade of her homeworld. Could her strong stance doom her peaceful planet to an invasion?

Meanwhile, on the remote outer-rim planet of Tatooine, a young boy, Anakin Skywalker (Jake Lloyd) lives with his mother (Pernilla August) in the service of the alien junk dealer, Watto. Anakin is gifted: a superb pilot, an expert mechanic, and strong in the Force. A twist of fate draws all of these characters together, and the adventure begins…

When Lucas crafted the original Star Wars, he had to build it as a stand-alone film, in case it turned out to be a flop. Even the “Episode IV” moniker was not applied until the film’s first theatrical re-release. The film was required to stand on its own merits, and it did so…with flying colors.

The Phantom Menace faces some of the same challenges of Star Wars: it must introduce a pantheon of new characters, and dazzle audiences now accustomed to impressive special effects. However, Lucas is now viewing the film as merely a cog as part of a larger whole…and that outlooks harms the film. Sorely needed plot and character development has been put on hold (with the assumed intention that they will be expanded upon on Episode 2 and Episode 3.) While it may make for a more integrated larger saga, The Phantom Menace is left as a much weaker film.

No where is that more evident than in the character of Obi-Wan Kenobi. Ewan McGregor is an extremely talented actor, but you would not be able to tell from his role in The Phantom Menace. He’s given one pivotal scene at the end, but aside from that he could nearly be an extra. Obi-Wan Kenobi shall be developed more fully in future episodes, but here he’s sorely underused.

On the opposite side of the spectrum stands a new character named Jar Jar Binks. When a creature is designed with the express purpose of being cute and lovable, it rarely is. Such is the case with Jar Jar, a clumsy amphibian filling the “Chewbacca slot” as the unusual alien sidekick. Overused throughout the movie, and annoying after a mere fifteen seconds, he also has the dubious distinction of introducing (or is that reducing) the Star Wars saga to the realm childish bathroom jokes.

The rest of the cast fall squarely in the middle, giving as good of performances as can be expected, considering they’re playing second fiddle to the special effects. Liam Neeson gives his Jedi warrior a stoic dignity beyond that allocated by the script. Pernilla August and Jake Lloyd have a few touching scenes, but Natalie Portman is mainly left to bark pompous declarations.

The film starts horribly, with a cryptically confusing opening crawl. It introduces a few token villains, perhaps the most unconvincing aliens in the entire series, and after a few minor, hastily edited action sequences brings us to the grating introduction of Jar Jar. Things look bleak, and they continue to get worse… But hold on, the movie does improve (quite a bit, actually). By the time the action reaches Tatooine, things are beginning to get in stride. The film ends with a rousing finale, during which even Jar Jar Binks doesn’t seem all that bad.

In his previous Star Wars films, George Lucas had assistance crafting the dialogue (Gloria Katz and Willard Huyck helped with Star Wars, and Lawrence Kasdan with Empire and Jedi). In the Phantom Menace, Lucas braves it alone…and it shows. The dialogue is clumsy and wooden throughout, and there are rarely any good character building moments.

But the Star Wars saga has never been about dialogue (even though the dialogue in Empire helped make it the best of the series), but entertainment. And on this level, The Phantom Menace delivers. The special effects are truly that, outstanding in a world where we’ve come to take awesome effects for granted. The action sequences (particularly the pod race) are exhilarating, and the film boasts the finest swordfighting of the series.

Still, amid the excitement, there’s something missing. The previous three films had villains who provided a tangible sense of evil. Episode One isn’t called The Phantom Menace for nothing…the menace here is entirely insubstantial. There is no good bad guy. Darth Maul comes close, but his menace is more symbolic than substantial. Though the fight sequences are wonderfully choreographed, there is no real impetus behind them…no emotional weight. Darth Maul and Darth Sideous are woefully underdeveloped, and the film suffers for it.

With the previous three films, Lucas has set a high standard for himself and the Star Wars saga…a standard that The Phantom Menace just doesn’t reach. As a film in its own right, it’s woefully sleight, but as entertaining a summer movie as you might hope for. The Phantom Menace may be the least of the four Star Wars movies, but it is still a rousing good time.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Star Wars: Episode 1 – The Phantom Menace

Notting Hill - * * *

The idea behind Notting Hill is simple enough: Julia Roberts and Hugh Grant together in a romantic comedy. And even though the screenplay never gets much further than that concept, it carries it off surprisingly well. Julia Roberts plays a wonderful Julia Roberts, and Hugh Grant nails his role as Hugh Grant. Notting Hill achieves its goal, being both romantic and funny, it is just what you want in a romantic comedy.

Hugh Grant stars as William Thacker, a divorced Englishman who is the proprietor of a highly unsuccessful travel bookshop in London’s Notting Hill district. He lives with an eccentric roommate, Spike (Rhys Ifans), and spends his time searching for (yet never finding) the perfect woman.

In a role that must have been a terrible stretch, Julia Roberts portrays the incredibly famous actress, Anna Scott. In London to promote her latest film, Anna drops by William’s bookstore on a whim. One thing leads to another, and Anna and William start falling in love.

But can Anna and William truly have a discrete relationship? Or is the gulf between rich and poor, between common and famous just simply too large?

Obviously, neither Julia Roberts nor Hugh Grant have a tremendously hard time in this movie. Both merely seem to be playing versions of themselves. Julia gets plenty of chances to flash her golden smile, just as Hugh is given lots of opportunities to stammer appealingly. However, their personalities do have a certain spark, and even if the roles aren’t a stretch, they’re still appealing on screen.

The supporting cast is pleasantly colorful (or in the case of Rhys Ifans, a bit too colorful). They provide an amusing sideshow when you begin to get tired of Julia and Hugh’s showdown of mannerisms.

For the most part, Notting Hill is your standard everyday romantic comedy. There are a few moments that set it above the crowd, however. The film gets to take several knowing jabs at the movie biz and publicity machine. The press junket that William mistakenly wanders into is particularly apt and humorous.

There’s not much else in Notting Hill that would convert a hater of romantic comedies. This is strictly a genre affair. However, if the mere idea of Julia and Hugh getting together in a movie starts your heart aflutter, don’t worry, this movie does it right.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Notting Hill

Tea With Mussolini - [No Tickets]

Franco Zeffirelli directs this autobiographical comedy about a young boy (Baird Wallace) left in the care of three eccentric British women (Joan Plowright, Maggie Smith and Judi Dench), and a frequently widowed Jewish-American millionairess (Cher) in Tuscany from 1936 to 1944. Lily Tomlin, Charlie Lucas and Massimo Ghini will also star. John Mortimer wrote the screenplay.

Capsule Review: A disjointed comedy-drama whose point gets lost somewhere along the way. A terrific cast is ultimately wasted here.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Tea With Mussolini

William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream - * * *

William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream

Not to be confused with all those other Midsummer Night’s Dreams out there, William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream is an adaptation of, you guessed it, William Shakespeare’s beloved comedy. Boasting a star-studded cast, Michael Hoffman’s adaptation is mostly faithful to the original text…but his strange departures will leave you wondering.

A Midsummer Night’s Dream tells the tale of four young lovers: Hermia (Anna Friel), Demetrius (Christian Bale), Helena (Calista Flockheart) and Lysander (Dominic West). Lysander and Hermia are madly in love, but Hermia is betrothed to Demetrius, who is smitten with her. Meanwhile, Helena pines unrequitedly for the love of Demetrius.

The four lovers unwittingly find themselves one night in a magical forest, home of the feuding king and queen of fairies: Oberon (Rupert Everett) and Titania (Michelle Pfieffer). Oberon schemes with his fairy underling, Puck (Stanley Tucci), to tamper with the heart of not only Titania, but of the four lovers as well.

To add to the confusion, a group of amateur players is also using the forest as a practice ground for their production of Pyramus and Thisbe. Led by the weaver Bottom (Kevin Kline), the troupe is about to become enmeshed in a mischievous practical joke from Puck.

Apparently for a change of pace, Michael Hoffman has changed the setting of A Midsummer Night’s Dream from Ancient Greece to 1900s Tuscany. This makes the presence of Theseus (David Strathairn) and his amazon queen Hippolyta (Sophie Marceau) somewhat odd, but the film doesn’t give their presence a second thought. Perhaps he thought it would be a brilliant cinematic moment to intermingle the fairy world with such newfangled inventions as the bicycle and phonograph. He was wrong. The juxtaposition distracts rather than enhancing.

The lovers in A Midsummer Night’s Dream get the short end of the stick. They’re more mundane than the fairy denizens of the play, and much less amusing than the players. Despite the fact that the parts are virtually interchangeable, the four actors (Friel, Bale, Flockheart and West) do their best to imbue the characters with a hint of uniqueness.

But things certainly fare much better in the other roles of the play. Kevin Kline makes a superb Bottom, amiable, charming and blissfully accepting of the unusual world around him. Michelle Pfieffer is simply radiant as Titania. And Rupert Everett and Stanley Tucci seem to enjoy their role as they unleash the film’s magical mayhem.

Narratively, the Act V performance of Pyramus and Thisbe has always seemed like an unnecessary coda. However, performed with gusto by Kevin Kline and his coterie of bungling players, the sequence becomes the comic high point of the film.

For Shakespeare purists, this latest film adaptation of A Midsummer Night’s Dream is far from perfect. But, in the long run, it achieves Shakespeare’s lofty intentions: to amuse the masses.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream

The Mummy - * * 1/2*

The Mummy

The first image that pops in your head when you hear the title, The Mummy, is likely that of a slow walking corpse, thoroughly wrapped in gauze. This remake attempts to revitalize the stiff horror classic, not only replacing Ol’ Gauzy with a creepy corpse in various stages of decomposition, but retyping the entire film as a comic adventure. The film doesn’t succeed on all levels, but it is entertaining enough to compensate for its faults.

Way, way back in Egyptian times, the Egyptian priest Imhotep (Arnold Vosloo) made the mistake of getting involved with the pharoah’s wife. As punishment, the pharoah assigns Imhotep the most fearsome curse imaginable: an undeath of being buried alive with a host of flesh-eating beetles. And, oh yes, the curse also has a small little side effect that could make Imhotep an all-powerful immortal being…but that could never happen, could it?

Flash forward three thousand years. Rick O’Connell (Brendan Fraser), a mercenary who was serving in the French Foreign Legion, has discovered the lost city of Hamunaptra. A librarian, Evelyn (Rachel Weisz), and her playboy brother, Jonathan (John Hannah), hire Rick to guide them to the lost city, in hopes of finding buried treasure.

Of course, what they find is the mummified corpse of Imhotep…and a mysterious tome called The Book of the Dead. Of course, you can’t just leave a Book of the Dead unread, can you? So, before long, the mummy has awakened, and begins the search for the flesh which will regenerate him, and the soul which will reawaken his long dead love.

Whereas the original 1932 chiller, The Mummy, was quiet, subtle and, well, slow, this new Mummy is entirely a child of the event film craze of the 90s. Full of bombast, bluster and special effects galore, many of the sequences in the film seem to be purely for effects sake. From the digitally gorified monster to a personified wall of sand, The Mummy seeks to impress. But these days, it takes more that a few good effects to make a movie.

Yes, the film doesn’t make much sense when you stop and think about it. The film assigns this Egyptian priest the powers of the 10 Biblical plagues because, well, they happened in Egypt. Besides, he only gets around to using roughly half of them anyway (including the newfangled “mindless zombie” plague). Then again, once you accept the ol’ undead curse, you’ve got to take pretty much everything in stride. Realism isn’t of utmost importance here.

But, though The Mummy is not a film to be taken seriously, at least the film itself recognizes that fact. The action is all delivered with tongue firmly in cheek. At times, the film feels more like a spoof than a horror/adventure film…and that is its saving grace.

Brendan Fraser takes a well advised step away from the naive, goofy characters he’s usually typecast as, and delivers a solid performance as Rick O’Connell, adventure hero. It’s too bad he doesn’t have a leading lady to match. Rachel Weisz simply blunders through her role as the bookish, but beautiful librarian.

Kevin J. O’Connor, memorable as the comic relief sidekick in director Stephen Sommer’s previous effort, Deep Rising, is cast here in the role of the…comic relief sidekick. But this time, he’s on the bad guy’s side…and oftentimes overshadows the film’s main villain, Arnold Vosloo.

The Mummy owes more to Abbott and Costello than to Boris Karloff. It’s humorous and makes for a good time… what more can you ask of a 3000 year old corpse?

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Mummy

The Winslow Boy - * * * 1/2*

The Winslow Boy

David Mamet directs his adaptation of Terence Rattigan’s play based on the real-life story about a naval cadet who is accused of stealing a 5 shilling postal note, and the dire consequences extracted from the family who beleives him. Nigel Hawthorne, Jeremy Northam, Rebecca Pidgeon and Gemma Gones star.

Capsule Review: A legal drama that is dry at times, but well written. The characters are interesting, and the film raises some interesting questions about how far one should go to pursue vindication. Surprisingly, the courtroom is completely on the sidelines, as the film focuses on the family of the accused. This one’s well worth watching.

Posted in 1999, Movie Reviews | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Winslow Boy